Reasons Why Local Communities Don’t Like Digital Nomads

Across the globe, from the beaches of Bali to the bustling streets of Barcelona, a surge in digital nomadism is reshaping the landscape of work and travel. This trend, which merges remote work with globetrotting, has emerged from obscurity into the limelight.

Post-pandemic, the number of digital nomads has skyrocketed by 131%, but with this growth has also come a significant number of critics, who refer to this phenomenon as a modern form of colonialism. In locations overwhelmed by digital nomads, for example, there’s a noticeable shift, from indigenous languages to English. Digital nomads also often take advantage of living somewhere with a lower living cost while earning from a place with a stronger economy, which can drive up local rental prices and force residents to move further away from city centers. 

Beyond the surface, however, it’s crucial to consider other contributing factors. Numerous countries now actively attract the digital nomad community with tax benefits and specialized visas. Such governmental strategies, aimed at appealing to a global demographic, often prioritize the needs of digital nomads over local citizens. This is evident in cities like Lisbon and Barcelona, where the influx of tourists and nomads has strained the local housing market and overcrowded public spaces. Locals in Mexico City and Chiang Mai have also expressed concerns over the rising living costs and cultural dilution due to the increase in digital nomads.

The impact of digital nomadism varies globally, influenced by unique historical, economic, and cultural contexts. Recent studies, for example, like those conducted by Olga Hannonen in Gran Canaria, reveal a generally positive local reception towards digital nomads, perceived as a boon to the economy and social milieu. These nomads often frequent local cafes and restaurants, which double as their workspaces, fostering interactions with residents. 

This isn’t, however, a universal experience. Interactions in Bali between locals and nomads, as explored by Shaun Busuttil, are mostly limited to business transactions. The segregation is not policy-driven but results from economic disparities. For instance, digital nomads may spend half of their daily Balinese salary on one cup of specialty coffee. 

The cultural and economic divide is not just confined to Bali and Gran Canaria. In other parts of the Global South, similar patterns emerge, where locals are often found only as service staff in establishments catering to foreign clientele. This is in stark contrast to the potential for smoother integration in European contexts, where shared cultural backgrounds ease interactions.

Furthermore, instances of inappropriate behavior by tourists in Bali have led to a mixed reception of foreigners, which impacts the perception of digital nomads. Their presence, while economically beneficial, sometimes clashes with local cultural norms, leading to backlash by the local community.

The varied responses around the world underscore the importance of considering the local context in understanding the dynamics between digital nomads and host communities. The increase is truly a double-edged sword, offering benefits to the local economy while also posing challenges to local cultures and economies.

(Source: pursuit.unimelb.edu.au by Shaun Busuttil)